View Single Post
  #1  
Unread 05-21-2015, 04:28 PM
nmrlearner's Avatar
nmrlearner nmrlearner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 23,199
Points: 193,617, Level: 100
Points: 193,617, Level: 100 Points: 193,617, Level: 100 Points: 193,617, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 50.7%
Activity: 50.7% Activity: 50.7% Activity: 50.7%
Last Achievements
Award-Showcase
NMR Credits: 0
NMR Points: 0
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default Analysis of the performance of the CHESHIRE and YAPP methods at CASD-NMR round 3.

Analysis of the performance of the CHESHIRE and YAPP methods at CASD-NMR round 3.

Related Articles Analysis of the performance of the CHESHIRE and YAPP methods at CASD-NMR round 3.

J Biomol NMR. 2015 May 20;

Authors: Cavalli A, Vendruscolo M

Abstract
We present an analysis of the results obtained at CASD-NMR round 3 by the CHESHIRE and the YAPP methods. To determine protein structures, the CHESHIRE method uses solely information provided by NMR chemical shifts, while the YAPP method uses an automated assignment of NOESY spectra. Of the ten targets of CASD-NMR round 3, nine CHESHIRE predictions and eight YAPP ones were submitted. The eight YAPP predictions ranged from 0.7 to 1.9 Å C? accuracy, with an average of 1.3 Å. The nine CHESHIRE predictions ranged from 0.8 to 2.6 Å C? accuracy for the ordered regions of the proteins, with an average of 1.6 Å. Taken together, these results illustrate how the NOESY based YAPP method and the chemical shift based CHESHIRE method can provide structures of comparable quality.


PMID: 25990018 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]



More...
Reply With Quote


Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No