View Single Post
  #1  
Unread 10-16-2013, 11:22 AM
nmrlearner's Avatar
nmrlearner nmrlearner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 23,191
Points: 193,617, Level: 100
Points: 193,617, Level: 100 Points: 193,617, Level: 100 Points: 193,617, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 50.7%
Activity: 50.7% Activity: 50.7% Activity: 50.7%
Last Achievements
Award-Showcase
NMR Credits: 0
NMR Points: 0
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default Protein Dielectric Constants Determined from NMR Chemical Shift Perturbations.

Protein Dielectric Constants Determined from NMR Chemical Shift Perturbations.

Protein Dielectric Constants Determined from NMR Chemical Shift Perturbations.

J Am Chem Soc. 2013 Oct 14;

Authors: Kukic P, Farrell D, McIntosh LP, Garcia-Moreno E B, Jensen KS, Toleikis Z, Teilum K, Nielsen JE

Abstract
Understanding the connection between protein structure and function requires a quantitative understanding of electrostatic effects. Structure-based electrostatics calculations are essential for this purpose, but their use have been limited by a long-standing discussion on which value to use for the dielectric constants (?eff and ?p) required in Coulombic models and Poisson-Boltzmann models. The currently used values for ?eff and ?p are essentially empirical parameters calibrated against thermo-dynamic properties that are indirect measurements of protein electric fields. We determine optimal values for ?eff and ?p by measuring protein electric fields in solution using direct detection of NMR chemical shift perturbations (CSPs). We measured CSPs in fourteen proteins to get a broad and general characterization of electric fields. Coulomb's law reproduces the measured CSPs optimally with a protein dielectric constant (?eff) from 3 to 13, with an optimal value across all proteins of 6.5. However, when the water-protein interface is treated with finite difference Poisson-Boltzmann calculations, the optimal protein dielectric constant (?p) rangedsfrom 2-5 with an optimum of 3. It is striking how similar this value is to the dielectric constant of 2-4 meas-ured for protein powders, and how different it is from the ?p of 6-20 used in models based on the Poisson-Boltzmann equation when calculating thermodynamic parameters. Because the value of ?p = 3 is obtained by analysis of NMR chemical shift perturba-tions instead of thermodynamic parameters such as pKa values, it is likely to describe only the electric field and thus represent a more general, intrinsic, and transferable ?p common to most folded proteins.


PMID: 24124752 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]



More...
Reply With Quote


Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No