Thread: Question from NMRWiki Q&A forum Saturation pulse
View Single Post
  #1  
Unread 10-17-2012, 12:14 AM
nmrlearner's Avatar
nmrlearner nmrlearner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 23,192
Points: 193,617, Level: 100
Points: 193,617, Level: 100 Points: 193,617, Level: 100 Points: 193,617, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 50.7%
Activity: 50.7% Activity: 50.7% Activity: 50.7%
Last Achievements
Award-Showcase
NMR Credits: 0
NMR Points: 0
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default Saturation pulse

Saturation pulse

I keep getting myself lost when thinking about saturation pulses, a pulse in which there is no magnetisation in the z direction. Now I know a 90 degree pulse rotates polarisation to xy however to make sure we have have got all the magnetisation we do a train of 90 degree pulses. The problem comes if you do two 90 degrees pulse right after each other it is similar to a 180 pulse - a few degrees. So we shall assume we rotate about x. do we have to time each pulse so that the xy magnetisation is pointing in x (so the rotation does nothing)and any z magnetisation will get rotated as normal. The problem with this is that the magnetisation will de phase over time so does that mean there is also a 180 echo when the xy magnetisation is in the y to keep the overall phase?

Is there something i'm missing?

Does the classical idea still work or do i have to look at quantumly and think about emission and stimulation probabilities?



Check if somebody has answered this question on NMRWiki QA forum
Reply With Quote


Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No