View Single Post
  #1  
Unread 08-17-2011, 01:33 PM
nmrlearner's Avatar
nmrlearner nmrlearner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 23,204
Points: 193,617, Level: 100
Points: 193,617, Level: 100 Points: 193,617, Level: 100 Points: 193,617, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 50.7%
Activity: 50.7% Activity: 50.7% Activity: 50.7%
Last Achievements
Award-Showcase
NMR Credits: 0
NMR Points: 0
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default From NMR Relaxation to Fractional Brownian Dynamics in Proteins : Results from a Virtual Experiment.

From NMR Relaxation to Fractional Brownian Dynamics in Proteins : Results from a Virtual Experiment.

From NMR Relaxation to Fractional Brownian Dynamics in Proteins : Results from a Virtual Experiment.

J Phys Chem B. 2011 Aug 15;

Authors: Calligari PA, Calandrini V, Kneller GR, Abergel D

In a recent simulation study [J. Chem. Phys., vol.*133, p.*145101, (2010)] it has been shown that the time correlation functions probed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxation spectroscopy of proteins are well described by a fractional Brownian dynamics model, which accounts for the wide spectrum of relaxation rates characterizing their internal dynamics. Here we perform numerical experiments to explore the the possibility to use this model directly in the analysis of experimental NMR relaxation data. Starting from a molecular dynamics simulation of the 266-residue protein 6PGL in explicit water, we construct virtual 15N R1, R2 and NOE relaxation rates at two different magnetic fields, including artificial noise, and test how far the parameters obtained from a fit of the model to the virtual experimental data coincide with those obtained from an analysis of the MD time correlation functions which have been used to construct these data. We show that in most cases close agreement is found. Acceptance or rejection of parameter values obtained from relaxation rates are discussed on a physical basis, therefore avoiding overfitting.

PMID: 21842881 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]



Source: PubMed
Reply With Quote


Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No