View Single Post
  #1  
Unread 09-23-2011, 05:30 PM
nmrlearner's Avatar
nmrlearner nmrlearner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 23,185
Points: 193,617, Level: 100
Points: 193,617, Level: 100 Points: 193,617, Level: 100 Points: 193,617, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 50.7%
Activity: 50.7% Activity: 50.7% Activity: 50.7%
Last Achievements
Award-Showcase
NMR Credits: 0
NMR Points: 0
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default Nanodiscs vs. Macrodiscs for NMR of Membrane Proteins.

Nanodiscs vs. Macrodiscs for NMR of Membrane Proteins.

Nanodiscs vs. Macrodiscs for NMR of Membrane Proteins.

Biochemistry. 2011 Sep 21;

Authors: Park SH, Berkamp S, Cook GA, Chan MK, Viadiu H, Opella SJ

Abstract
It is challenging to find membrane mimics that stabilize the native structure, dynamics, and functions of membrane proteins. In a recent advance, nanodiscs have been shown to provide a bilayer environment compatible with solution NMR. Increasing the lipid to "belt" peptide ratio expands their diameter, slows their reorientation rate, and enables the protein-containing discs to be aligned in a magnetic field for Oriented Sample solid-state NMR. Here, we compare the spectroscopic properties of membrane proteins with between one and seven trans-membrane helices in q=0.1 isotropic bicelles, ~10 nm diameter isotropic nanodiscs, ~30 nm diameter magnetically aligned macrodiscs, and q=5 bicelles.


PMID: 21936505 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]



Source: PubMed
Reply With Quote


Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No